For centuries, the definition of manhood occupied a very certain and narrow definition, backed up by social convention, regulated by laws, reinforced by religion, making it clearly an unquestionable quality. Male-ness was defined as a persona of self-control, stoicism, dominance of others (especially women, children, and non-citizens), self-reliance, individualism and an unquestionable adherence to the status quo. Being a man and acting properly also required one to know their place in life, and to acknowledge and obey their betters. Showing emotions and publicly reacting to grief, loss, physical pain, showing sympathy and exercising charity and forgiveness to strangers, and even compassion to transgressors were the kinds of weaknesses that a confident and proper man would avoid like the plague. The only kind of emotion that was not frowned upon was anger, hatred, violence (having a good fight, even with friends), and happiness or contentment. The silent man who did his duty without complaint and who showed no fear or pain, but who maintained his authority and dignity at all times, was the perfect role model of manhood.
Retrospectively, this coded behavior is called today the Man Box, and has a distinct definition for what a man should be like. Here is what Mark Green describes as the Man Box.
“..the Man Box is a set of rigid expectations that define what a ‘real man’ is. A real man is strong and stoic. He doesn’t show emotions other than anger and excitement. He is a breadwinner. He is heterosexual. He is able-bodied. He plays or watches sports. He is the dominant participant in every exchange. He is a firefighter, a lawyer, a CEO. He is a man’s man. And whether or not we’d actually want to spend any time with him, we all know who he is.”
I grew up seeing John Wayne exemplify this kind of ultra masculine persona, as did Sean Connery, Clint Eastwood, Silvester Stallone, Bruce Willis, Wesley Snipes and of course, Arnold Schwarzenegger. These were real men, and the rest of us were just trying, more or less, to imperfectly fit into that stereotype. Real men were soldiers, policemen, firemen, lumberjacks, big game hunters, sportsmen, adventurers and mountain climbers, fighter pilots, scuba divers, roughneck builders of skyscrapers, fishermen, explorers, astronauts, wealthy industrialists and popular politicians.
You were considered a manly man if you performed one of those kinds jobs and was tall, athletic, and well hung. Others deferred to you, and you were considered an alpha male, while the rest were deemed to be lesser men, or beta males. Life was uncomplicated following this code, or so it seemed, and to fit into the definition of an alpha male conferred powers and respect, but it also required extreme self-control. An alpha male who became a drunkard, or engaged in criminal activity, or was found to be gay, or a cross-dresser, would immediately lose his self-respect and status. Being a lesser man also had its costs, since often respect and status were denied someone who was neither overly fit and physically confident or showed the wrong kind of emotions or had the wrong kind of interests. (Yes, that’s me!)
However, all of this began to change during the 1970's with the advent of women’s liberation, and it has continued as women have broken down barriers and gained positions of authority in the workforce. When I started my career in data processing (as it was called then), there were few if any women amongst my colleagues. Women were secretaries, and perhaps worked as computer operators, but men wrote the computer code and ran the businesses. In just a scant twenty years, all that completely changed, and I now work with men and women equally in my IT profession. Because I was never an alpha male, and even became quite an outcast when I got involved in Witchcraft and magic, I seemed to bypass a lot of what I came to see as an artificial and valueless persona or mask, and that what really counted was not how much a man you were, but how much of a human being you were. But that was my experience, yet other men continued down the pathway of finding it more difficult to define themselves in world where the definitions and values were rapidly changing and being socially transformed.
Now in the new millennium, things have changed so much and become so complicated that simple self-definitions can no longer help men to define themselves. The world is no longer binary, consisting of either good or evil, it is mostly just grey. Gender has been shown to be very complex, and the binary representation of yesterday has been replaced with more accurate genetic representation of what it is to be a gendered human being. This is also true for sexuality, since there is now an acceptance of gays and lesbians, as well as other kinds of consensual engagements between adults. Learning to respect how people define themselves, and to ensure that they have the right to express themselves sexually with full consenting participation should be part of the general perspective of being an adult member of our society. It wasn’t that way early in my lifetime, but it should have been if we were promoting freedom and equality for everyone. All of these massive social changes have been met with a certain degree of public rejoicing, but also a sense of fear, confusion and with some, feelings of inadequacy and rejection.
Those who identify as cis-gender heterosexual men in our post modern western world are generally experiencing a crisis of belief and self-definition because of all these changes. This is particularly true for younger men who are members of the Generations X, Y and Z. They were born into a world that had already changed, and were seeking to define themselves when the values of that self-definition were in a state of flux. It was also a world that was more difficult to be materially successful after assuming a massive education debt, and the loss of jobs and job training for those who were not cut out for college or higher education. It was a world that seemed to offer and promise everything, except the means to realize that promise. A definition of masculinity was always based on exclusive self-worth, status and personal dignity, and these could not easily be achieved if one was not also successful. Often self-worth came from interaction with our peers and authority figures when growing to adulthood, and any kind of continual rejection could doom someone to a life of failure and worthlessness.
I think that the men of the WWII generation and the Boomer generation did not have such a difficult time growing up because the issues of masculinity didn’t exist at that time, and the identity of being a heterosexual male was not facing any of the later massive societal pressures to change. The WWII generation of men were forced by circumstances to take on adult responsibilities as young men, quickly losing their innocence and their youth. There wasn’t any room in their lives, either before the war or even afterwards, for self-reflection or self-doubt. Their movie heros exemplified this kind of mind-state, and all seemed to be simply defined, even though it really wasn’t. In the shadows and behind the social facade lurked other kinds of men, whether of different races, economic status or sexual preferences, but like the emotional state of the manly man, these were intensely suppressed.
Boomers, such as myself, experienced the counter culture and were allowed to break out of the strict definitions of masculinity, to experiment, and to accept and be open to others who were different. Of course that openness didn’t really last, but many people who are older and educated now seem willing to accept these social changes, and in some ways, probably had a hand in making them happen. It was a kind of civil rights for those who were not part of the socially acceptable heterosexual mind-set. We were fortunate that we had the time to seemingly gradually change and accept a greater degree of freedom and acceptance of people who were not like the majority, but who included friends, children, and relatives, which were the kind of close associations impossible to reject. Over time we learned to accept these differences, and even encourage their expression.
Still, we had this media display that was ever saturated with uber masculine figures who functioned as vigilante loners, who through their power and single-mindedness, were able to exact justice and revenge. Comic book heroes were defined this way, and so were the heroes of movies, video shows, games, anime and cartoons. Violence and destruction were lionized, and those who tried to mitigate the injustice or succumbed to self-pity or self-abuse were considered weak, cowardly, and doomed. They were the victimized losers. Evil forces were clearly defined as the ubiquitous “Other” or were from inimical governments, or even our own government or deep-state. While such displays of masculinity were quite popular in my age, and even before (my parents’ age), not matching up with the ultra-masculine role model was not considered a big deal. We liked these ideals, played around with them, but we knew that they were fictional and impossible to fully assume. Those who tried would self-destruct, and we were told that true heroes did their jobs without any thought of being heroic or famous - that was for movie stars, politicians, televangelist minsters, and rock stars. The rest of us were okay just being who we were and trying to live our lives the best we could, knowing that we would never measure up to the heroic masculine ideal. Even though the Man Box still had a compelling hold on the masculine identity all throughout this time, yet the age of Hippies and later, Disco, seemed to mitigate it somewhat.
That was then, and a massively changed social world is what it is now. I got to see it change during my lifetime, but I also had the time to change with it. Not everyone was as open minded as I have been about gender and sexuality, and I knew from my experiences that there were individuals who were stuck in the past and who rejected the changes that were happening in our culture. These were individuals who were socially conservative, deeply religious and who believed that their religious based definition of the roles assumed by men and women were ordained by God to be what they have always been. Those who acted outside of these ordained norms or were their spoke-persons (Liberal Elite) were the hosts of Sodom and Gomorrah, blighted by sin, and seeking to unleash a diabolic evil in our nation. These individuals were the carriers of a highly restrictive and repressive definition of gender and sexuality, and they brought these beliefs from the WWI generation, through the Boomers and into the present age, particularly to the members of Generation X.
Typically, religious extremists would represent a kind of crackpot belief system that most would deride and then ignore, if it were not for other forces that have seized our economic world order. These forces can be traced to the emerging and powerful oligarchy that has all-but eliminated the possibility of economic mobility and the personal achievement of material success - a hallmark of our nation called the American Dream. It started in the 1980's with Ronald Reagan and the conservative wave that was popularized in that time, to run counter to the counter culture that was retreating. It became ever more powerful in the 1990's, with the ascending popularity of the religious right, and in the 21st century it was fully active as a fascistic form of Christian Nationalism. Yet this ultra conservative movement hid a sinister truth, and that is that those who were funding and promoting this ideology were the ultra-wealthy and connected, newly realized oligarchy. High tech spawned a group of mostly men who became fabulously wealthy, and what helped them achieve that was Reagan’s tax breaks for the rich and a supposed trickle-down philosophy that said the rich would benefit the middle class. Of course, that was all a deceitful line of propaganda, and the reality was that opportunity and taxation based redistribution began to disappear altogether.
Culture wars hid the truth of what was happening, focusing people on divisive ideology while the ultra-wealthy changed the laws to exclusively benefit them. Reduced taxes for the rich meant that there was no longer money for education, social services, infrastructure, and affordable housing and a job that provided a sustainable and livable source of income. These were all things that I was given when I legally became an adult. That was the world that I was born into. It wasn’t perfect, but a person could survive, even comfortably, if they worked hard and lived an honest life. There have always been wealthy individuals and privileged generations born into wealth, but the tax rate in the 1950's and 1960's ensured that high earners had their wealth redistributed to worthy social causes. That changed in the 1980's with the Reagan revolution. Now, the promises of getting a good education, finding a job that can readily support a family, being able to buy a home or find affordable housing have become less likely, opening up a chasm of debt, obstruction and limited possibilities.
Of course, the women’s liberation movement matured and brought women into the workplace, feminist activism was instrumental in changing the perception of discriminated and marginalized groups, such as members of the LGBTQ community and minority women. Women saw the opportunities inherent in the changing demographics of the workplace and sought higher education and therefore, greater status and better productive roles in society. The “Me Too” movement in the early 2000's brought a stark focus on the all-too common occurrence of women who experience sexual assault and how society as a whole have ignored their plight until now. That produced a movement for social change and placed extreme pressures on the male psyche, but for good reasons. Still, someone who is better educated and more experienced about the world will likely have a liberal or at least moderate political perspective, and young women today are exceedingly bright, well educated, upwardly mobile and very liberal, despite the effects of the ascending power of the oligarchy.
Since I was witnessing these changes from a perspective of being established in my career and economic status, I thought that the old model of the Man Box was finally going away. I had involuntarily opted out when I became a Witch and a practitioner of ritual magic, so I had very little invested in that way of thinking about masculinity. I welcomed the changes and looked forward to the opportunities brought on by the ending of a regressive social theme that had plagued so many men for so long. However, I was so dead wrong about that being the case, because young men were not experiencing the same upward ascent that young women were experiencing. I had missed out on that other perspective, although I had observed more young men saying things and acting in ways that should have clued me in regarding what was really going down.
Young men generally have a different story from young women, and that is one of decline. Women are going to universities in record numbers, and achieving graduate degrees, while men are conversely declining in numbers in these same institutions. Not everyone is cut out for college, and in my day there were trade schools that could nearly guarantee a good paying job once one graduated. There were also union apprenticeships, and entry level factory or construction work. Those jobs and their associated training regimens have largely disappeared. What is left are low paying jobs in various shops and stores, repair facilities, small businesses and fast food stores. Factories have become highly automated or have moved overseas to take advantage of low paying workers. Many of these low paying jobs force competition between native locals and immigrants. I have heard and met young men who had to live with their parents after getting or failing to get an expensive but worthless college degree.
For a man, self-esteem and status are still based almost entirely on material success, and not having the right kind of education or experience will doom someone to a lower economic status. The contrast between successful and upwardly mobile women and men who are experiencing a downward economic trend could not be more stark in our current society. This is a phenomenon that seems to be occurring in many parts of the world at the same time. Also, less education breeds a susceptibility to conspiracy theories, propaganda, urban myths, and can produce a counter dialogue fed by discontent and anger at the status quo. Throw in the factor of the internet, mass-misinformation, and addictive gaming activities thereby creating a population of isolated and disadvantaged young men, and the lack of success either with basic economics or with the opposite sex, and you have the essence of the current crisis facing young men.
What that crisis is causing is a blow-back of anger and resentment at the establishment, a desire to identify with the old trope of the Man Box, and a superficial adherence to Christian Nationalism promoting the overthrow of our constitutional republic and its associated liberal social conscience for a strongman led autocracy. In that world, somehow, the economic and social wrongs that have afflicted young white cis-gender heterosexual men will be overcome, and the old ways of manly men will be restored. Trump, of course, is the figurehead for this backlash, and it is fueled by the anger and the fear of a diminishing world of possibilities and the ending of white privilege. Of course these are the lies and propaganda spread by the ascending fascist political movement, and they hide the real villains, who are the ultra-wealthy oligarchs. The old ways won’t come back, and nothing will rescue the afflicted young men, because the oligarchs are planning for a reversal of the modern FDR-based social contract to create a servant class, and those on the bottom will remain on the bottom. As long as everyone continues to buy and consume on some level, the rich will remain rich - or so they think. The middle class made the oligarchs rich beyond their wildest dreams, and if the middle class falls, then the wealthy will ultimately fall as well.
So what do we do about this huge crisis? Part of the problem is economic, part of it is social, and another part of it is the phenomenon of the internet creating social isolation. If you don’t meet and talk to friends in public settings, it can make a person callous, and socially insensitive and blind to other people’s feelings. What is needed is a counter dialogue telling young men about who the real enemy of the people are and who are their backers, and focus their anger in a constructive manner. The solution is to vote those who back the oligarchy out of power and to aggressively reject them. Their solutions and promises are all lies and deceit, and the sooner the internet media starts calling them for what they are, the sooner the first stages of the fix will occur.
We need job programs and training, incentives for new technologies that solve social and climate issues, and the creation of new good paying jobs. We need affordable housing, better systems of social assistance and psychological counseling open to everyone, and universal healthcare. Maybe some kind of universal basic income as well to mitigate low wages. To pay for all of these expanded social programs we will tax the fuck out of the rich - make the oligarchs pay for it all. We should create a movement to bring young men out of their man-caves and into the public sphere, and we should build free public places for young people to safely congregate and socialize. It can be done, but first we have to put the squeeze on the ultra-wealthy and make them, and their crony corporations, pay their fair share of taxes. I envision a level of taxation to be similar if not greater than what is being done in Europe. Do we want a satisfactory public life with all kinds of amenities? Then we need a tax base to make that happen. The oligarchs have been given a free ride for too long, and to forestall the collapse of the middle class and the end of our vibrant and progressive culture, we as a collective group need to act.
There is hope for a better society, and hope that the current Man Box counter revolution can be safely and peacefully ended once and for all. It takes reaching out and communicating to young people, and to speak truth to power, and truth to lies, deception and social evils. Ending the oligarchy in this nation will open the gates to a brave new world, one where the issues of the day can be resolved by collective effort and a realization that we need to act and vote to further our economic interests, and to cut conservative religion movements completely out of politics once and for all.
Here is the silver lining (also from Mark Green):
“In a time of social and economic upheaval, what may seem like a raft of challenges for men and women actually represents a vast landscape of opportunity. The Man Box’s promise of economic security in exchange for social conformity is crumbling. Pension funds are collapsing. Jobs are gone overseas. Where there once was a promise of career security there is now none. The cheese that baited the Man Box trap is gone.
Into the vacuum of these broken social contracts, a new breed of men and women are emerging. Among these are men who work as full time parents. Men who take joy in supporting their families emotionally as well as financially. Men who are struggling to end the rigid gender roles that our culture continues to force on their sons and daughters. Men who express gender in much more diverse ways.”
Frater Barrabbas